Gaylord Perry -- Hall of Fame 1991

Acquired: Private Signing 
Promoter: N/A
Signing Date: 4/12/14
Submittal: 50/50
My Request: Sweet spot, blue pen, HOF inscription
Commentary: Once again, the 1991 Hall of Fame class has proved to be very accessible for autographs. In fact, this was my first experience participating in a 50/50. For the unenlightened, a 50/50 is a form of a trade that plays out as follows: 

Step One
Person A sends Person B two items -- in this case the items are baseballs. 

Step Two
Person B keeps one baseball as compensation and returns the other ball to Person A after the ball has been autographed. 

As background, Gaylord Perry appeared last month at the Mickey Mantle Classic in Commerce, Oklahoma. As a guest, Perry did a signing then and there. Prior to the appearance, a reliable member on SCF made the trade arrangements with me. 

In a complicated world, a simple 50/50 is a thing of beauty. Transactions don't get any easier than this. I would welcome the opportunity to do more 50/50s, but I suspect they will be few and far between.

Red Schoendienst -- Hall of Fame 1989

Acquired: Private Signing
Promoter: Tom Orr
Signing Date: 4/8/14
Submittal: $35 check, ROMLB, SASE
My Request: Sweet spot, blue pen, HOF inscription
Commentary: I recently connected with Tom Orr for my first autographed ball obtained via private signing. I was pleased with that outcome -- an autographed Ozzie Smith ball. As a result, I utilized Orr once again for another Cardinal Hall of Famer, Red Schoendienst. Schoendienst is currently 91 years-old, yet his signature remains clean and not shaky. I have now obtained autographed balls from two members of the 1989 Hall of Fame class; first Johnny Bench and now Schoendienst. Yaz -- who is accessible but not cheap -- represents the final piece of the puzzle.

Book Review -- New Bill James Historical Abstract

Reading the New Bill James Historical Abstract from cover to cover was my New Year’s resolution for 2014. Growing up in the 1980s, I certainly read my fair share of Bill James. Until recently, however, I had never taken the plunge and endeavored to read every word of his 1,000 page masterpiece.

Now that I’m done, I feel more enriched by this Abstract than any other baseball book I have ever read. Page for page, nothing else compares. 

Since the Historical Abstract has been universally praised, I thought it would be more interesting to summarize its surprising qualities as well as its deficiencies.

Five deficiencies:

• Baseball is half offense, half defense. Yet, among the positional rankings, 475 pages are devoted to hitters and only 75 pages are devoted to pitchers. Lumping starters and closers together could also be reevaluated.
• The Abstract leans heavily on a statistic James devised called Win Shares. If you reject the methodology of Win Shares, you thus reject the premise of the rankings.
• Bill James is from Kansas. Players who are from Kansas or who played for Kansas City get more ink than others do. References to Joe Tinker abound. And brace yourself for George Brett to be mentioned in the same breath as the legends.
• There are some head-scratchers in the positional rankings in that the treatment seems uneven. Among catchers, James devoted 10 pages to Ernie Lombardi while Terry Steinbach got one sentence. At first base, Jeff Bagwell received a one word tribute -- “Pass”.
• The author seems to take strange delight in calling players fat or racist. Sometimes both!

Five surprises:

• I would not have anticipated that the Abstract is a treasure trove of baseball book recommendations.
• At most positions, after the first 40 or so players ranked out of 100, the difference among them seems irrelevant.
• Most positions are shockingly thin among the all-time rankings. Two examples: Even at a key position like center field, Ray Lankford clocks in at #49 all time. Juan Samuel, mostly thought of as a dud, is also a Top 100 player.
• James freely acknowledges the quirks of his Win Shares system. This is very fair of him. I have never read a book with a tone so authoritative yet so modest.

The fifth surprising element is that there are dozens of terrific essays buried among the player rankings. For example, the passage about Ryne Sandberg essentially has nothing to do with the Hall of Fame second baseman. Meanwhile, the passage about Steve Sax is almost entirely about Ryne Sandberg. (Instead of discussing Sax in the Sax bio, James examines how likely a player with Sandberg’s rookie statistics will end up enshrined in Cooperstown.) The downside of this surprise-and-delight approach is that if you find an essay that you want to revisit at a later date, it’s almost impossible to ever find it again.

Some of the best entries include those for Willie Wilson, Ernie Lombardi, Dummy Hoy, Pete Rose and Steve Carlton. My favorite hitter and pitcher entries are Richie Ashburn’s and Tommy John’s.

Overall, the analysis is brilliant. Is there anyone else on the planet who has better dexterity than James with both words and numbers?

Ozzie Smith -- Hall of Fame 2002

Acquired: Private Signing
Promoter: Tom Orr
Signing Date: 3/1/14
Submittal: $50 check, ROMLB, SASE
My Request: Sweet spot, blue pen, HOF inscription
Commentary: This Ozzie Smith ball represents my first acquisition through a private signing. Prioritizing a modern Cardinals Hall of Famer might at first blush seem like a strange move for a Cubs fan like myself. But I harbor no ill-will towards Ozzie Smith. Above all -- I had a seven-year hole to fill in my project between 1997 and 2005. Overall, both the '97 inductees and the '05 inductees have signed for me TTM. The Hall of Famers in between, however, have not been as accessible for autographs.

Doug Harvey -- Hall of Fame 2010

Acquired: TTM
Sent: 2/3/14
Received: 2/21/14
Turnaround: 18 days
Submittal: $15 cash, ROMLB, SASE
My Request: Sweet spot, blue pen, HOF & "god" inscriptions
Commentary: With the addition of this baseball, I have now completed the 2010 Hall of Fame induction class -- Andre Dawson, Whitey Herzog and now former umpire Doug Harvey. In my LOR, I requested the double inscriptions along with his autograph. Got all three. I'm happy about that because I have always thought that "god" was one of the best nicknames in the game. For context, Doug Harvey is the only living umpire in Cooperstown. The induction of an ump is rare, but he was that good -- hence the nickname. 

Book Review -- The Bronx Zoo

The Bronx Zoo is a poor man’s Ball Four. The books share many attributes, yet the key difference is that Jim Bouton’s Ball Four is a much better memoir than Sparky Lyle’s Bronx Zoo.

Obligatory comparisons between Bronx Zoo and Ball Four are essentially unavoidable because of the abundant similarities: Both authors adopted a season-long diary format. Both authors were former New York Yankees relief pitchers. Both authors clung to less-than-ideal roles on their respective pitching staffs. In both cases, the books proved inflammatory and reached the New York Times best-seller list.

The best moments of The Bronx Zoo occur when Sparky Lyle neglects to pull his punches. In fact, in what seems like a calculated move, Lyle fires a huge shot over the bow on page one: “No one can blow his own horn like Jim Palmer can”. Later, in regards to Reggie Jackson:

Reggie has always said, “If Reggie Jackson doesn’t hit, the Yankees don’t win.” Well, no kidding. When he’s in the f---ing number four spot and he’s striking out all the time, that’s the truth...

In fact, my inspiration to read The Bronx Zoo came not from Ball Four, but instead from 2010’s Steinbrenner: The Last Lion of Baseball. In the latter, I took an almost strange delight in reading Bill Madden’s account of the dysfunctional, late 1970s Yankees. The next book I turned to was Bronx Zoo. At the end of it, I was left with a feeling of disappointment.

Overall, Bronx Zoo is an overrated memoir about Sparky Lyle losing his closer role over the course of the season. If the book succeeds, it’s because the subject matter -- Reggie, Billy and George -- is so rich. Looking back, it turns out that Lyle was the superior pitcher and Bouton was the superior author.

Favorite Line
Ted Williams was a coach there, and it was he who changed my life. He watched me pitch one afternoon, and afterward he asked me what I thought was the best pitch in baseball. I told him I didn’t know. “The slider. You know why?” I said no. He said, “Because it was the only pitch I couldn’t hit consistently even when I knew it was coming.” I was in awe of Williams.

Book Review -- Summer of '49

The sports media’s fawning over the rivalry between the Yankees and Red Sox has never been much of a pet peeve of mine. For whatever reason, all the uneven adulation heaped upon those two franchises does not bother me the way it bothers so many other people.

As even-tempered as I am about the subject matter, I nevertheless found it difficult to enjoy David Halberstam’s Summer of ‘49.

My first problem is the premise. Halberstam was not a baseball man, yet his opinionated book was published in 1989, forty years after the events it describes took place. Given the revisionist nature of old ballplayers and old managers, I question the stories and stats that the author presents as fact.

My second problem with the book is the author’s questionable analysis. A perfect example is Halberstam’s take the Red Sox’s shortstop controversy. Regarding Boston’s two options at short -- Johnny Pesky and Junior Stephens -- Halberstam writes that:

"At this most critical position, Boston was deficient. Junior Stephens played adequate shortstop, although in no sense was he one...Pesky had played shortstop before the trade, but McCarthy had moved him to third because he had better hands and was quicker."

As the great baseball writer Bill James has pointed out, “This is an amazing interpretation of the transaction. Nobody in the history of baseball was ever moved off of shortstop because he had good hands and quick feet.”

Yet another problem with the book -- the third and final issue that I will note -- is that Summer in ‘49 feels more like hero-worship than journalism. Rather than de-mistify Ted Williams and Joe DiMaggio, the author seems to actively contribute to building up the mystique.

Summer of ‘49 sometimes appears on lists of the top ten baseball books of all time, however, I didn’t care much for it. I formed my own opinion independent of others, and it’s felt very reaffirming to read other writers later discredit the book, too. In lieu of Summer in ‘49, James refers his readers to Robert Creamer’s Baseball in ‘41 instead.

Favorite Line:
Williams would never, no matter what the situation, go for a pitch that was even a shade outside the strike zone. DiMaggio was different: He believed that, as a power hitter on the team, he sometimes had an obligation to swing at imperfect pitches. On certain occasions a walk was not enough; it was a victory for the pitcher.

Tony La Russa -- Hall of Fame 2014

Acquired: TTM via Foundation
Sent: 1/10/14
Received: 1/31/14
Turnaround: 21 days
Submittal: $50 check, ROMLB, LOR, return envelope. I was instructed not to include postage on my return envelope.
My request: Blue pen, sweet spot, HOF inscription
Charity: ARF -- Tony La Russa's Animal Rescue Foundation
Commentary: I obtained this successful outcome through Tony La Russa's Animal Rescue Foundation, or ARF. Shortly after Tony La Russa had been elected to the Hall of Fame by the Veterans' Committee, I contacted Kathleen at ARF through its website. A formal process had not been put in place yet for submissions, so I e-mailed an inquiry. Kathleen quoted a price of $50 which includes an autograph and the HOF inscription. On one hand, this is the second highest I have ever paid for a Hall of Fame autograph through the mail. On the other hand, the price is reasonable and even understandable in light of La Russa's recent induction and the subsequent media exposure. Overall, the ball looks great, especially with the double inscriptions.

Rollie Fingers -- Hall of Fame 1992

Acquired: TTM
Sent: 12/13/13
Received: 1/2/14
Turnaround: 20 days
Submittal: $15, ROMLB, LOR, SASE
My request: Blue pen, sweet spot, HOF inscription
Commentary: The background behind my Rollie Fingers ball is similar to that of my Fergie Jenkins ball. The story is that I met both Hall of Famers last year at Hohokam Park during Cactus League. Proceeds from their March 9th autograph session went to the late Ron Santo's favorite charity -- JDRF (Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation). Overall, I was surprised and touched to see both Jenkins and Fingers devoting a Saturday to raise money for the key charity that Santo supported. I donated to both of the former pitchers, but since the autograph session took me by surprise, I was unprepared. As a result, I was unable to land their autographs on official baseballs. Months passed. Nine months later, I decided to circle back with Fingers through the mail to obtain his autograph and a HOF inscription on an official ball. The outcome of my latest success is pictured above. Note that Rollie signs through the mail for $10 less than Fergie. 

Ryne Sandberg -- Hall of Fame 2005

Acquired: TTM
Sent: 12/2/13
Received: 1/9/14
Turnaround: 38 days
Submittal: $25, ROMLB, LOR, SASE
My request: Blue pen, sweet spot, HOF inscription
Commentary: The off-season appears to be the best time of year to catch Ryne Sandberg for an autograph request through the mail. The timing makes perfect sense as Sandberg has worked various managerial gigs for years. As for which address to target, the success rate to his home address in Arizona seems to yield the best results. Please note that there are accounts of fans achieving this outcome from Ryno for much less than $25 -- some have even reported including only a handful of dollars. Nevertheless, I aimed high and included $25 for two reasons. First, I wanted to ensure any kind of success. Second, I requested a HOF 2005 inscription. In the end, I achieved the former, but not the latter. It will be interesting to see if Sandberg continues to sign with alacrity, now that his interim status as manager of the Philadephia Phillies has sequenced into a full-time role. Proceeds go to Sandberg's charity.

Whitey Herzog -- Hall of Fame 2010

Acquired: TTM
Sent: 12/13/13
Received: 12/24/13
Turnaround: 11 days
Submittal: $15, ROMLB, LOR, SASE
My request: Blue pen, sweet spot, HOF inscription
Commentary: There are accounts of people achieving this outcome from Whitey for only $10. But there are also accounts of Whitey leaving off the HOF inscription with $10 donations. I didn't want to risk not getting exactly what I wanted, so I included $15. Setting aside the inscription aspect, submitting to Whitey Herzog was about as straightforward as it gets. I wish they were all this easy. Proceeds go to his charity. 

Book Review -- Whatever Happened to the Hall of Fame?

Bill James is overflowing with genius in this great analysis of Cooperstown inductees. So much so that it’s not clear to me why Whatever Happened to the Hall of Fame? never seems to appear on lists of the best baseball books of all time. Perhaps renaming it “Everything You Wanted to Know about Phil Rizzuto (But Were Afraid to Ask)” would help it gain more notoriety among fans?

If you boil it down, James finds two key problems with the Hall: (i) there are players inside Cooperstown who should not have cleared the hurdle; and (ii) there are players outside Cooperstown who continue to wait for the call.

The biggest let down of the book was that James dwelled on the first category of players.

In fact, finding serious flaws with honorees is not that difficult, especially among Veterans Committee selections. Bill James, however, stands out among his peers because he is skillful not only with words, but also with numbers. 

Published in 1994, when he was at his peak as an author, James provides readers with a culmination of his methodologies:

• Similarity Scores
• The Hall of Fame Standards List
• The Black Ink Test
• The Hall of Fame Career Monitor
• Fibonacci Win Scores

Despite its age, Whatever Happened to the Hall? holds up well for two reasons: First, the “mistake” inductions will always be mistakes and they are just as relevant to read about today as they were in 1994. Second, James's persuasive arguments in this book have clearly nudged voters in the right direction since its publication.

Perhaps this book -- which has already been published under two different titles -- receives less adulation because it’s overshadowed by the ongoing Historical Baseball Abstract, Bill James’s life work. Twenty years have passed since Whatever Happened to the Hall? was released. I believe the timing is right for a major update.

Favorite Line

If I were in control of the Hall of Fame’s selections, the first player I would choose would be Ron Santo.

Fergie Jenkins -- Hall of Fame 1991

Acquired: TTM
Sent: 12/13/13
Received: 1/2/14
Turnaround: 20 days
Submittal: $25, ROMLB, LOR, SASE
My request: Blue pen, sweet spot, HOF inscription
Commentary: Last year during Spring Training, I had the opportunity to meet Fergie Jenkins at Hohokam Park, the former Cactus League home of the Chicago Cubs. On March 9th -- a Saturday afternoon -- Jenkins made an appearance to sign autographs on behalf of the late Ron Santo's favorite charity, JDRF (Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation). Santo, Jenkins's former teammate on the Cubs, passed away in 2010 after battling diabetes throughout his life. In 2012, Santo was posthumously elected to the Hall of Fame through the Veterans Committee. At any rate, I was both surprised and touched to see a Hall of Famer like Jenkins set up like this -- seated at essentially a card table behind the concession stands -- to honor his former teammate and raise money for Santo's charity. In March, Jenkins signed a cheap ball for me rather than a ROMLB. At the time, and in my mind, the autograph was merely an impulse buy and a donation than anything else. Last month, however, I decided to circle back with Jenkins through the mail to obtain an autograph on a legit ball. The result is the autographed ball pictured above. The accompanying photo is from March when Jenkins graciously offered to pose for pictures as well as sign. 

Book Review -- The Card by Michael O'Keefe and Teri Thompson

“The Card” is a deep dive into the history of the world’s most valuable baseball card -- a T206 Honus Wagner produced from 1909 to 1911. New York Daily News staffers Michael O’Keefe and Teri Thompson coauthored “The Card” in 2007, the same year that the finest example of the Wagner card sold for $2.8 million.

The authors do a fine job at producing a very readable book that can appeal to a broad audience. At first blush, people who are interested in reading books about baseball cards may seem like a niche audience. But this particular baseball card has received enormous publicity for decades, making it culturally and historically relevant. A T206 Wagner is not only held at the New York Metropolitan Museum of Art, but also at the New York Public Library. Less surprisingly, another version of the card has been on display at the National Baseball Hall of Fame in Cooperstown, New York.

A bit of background is in order. Honus Wagner -- alongside Babe Ruth and Ty Cobb -- was one of only five former players inducted into baseball’s inaugural Hall of Fame class in 1936. The T206 Honus Wagner has been the most valuable baseball card on the planet since 1933, when it was first listed in price guides at $50.

The high value stems largely from a limited print run. Production estimates range from 60 to 200. The reason for the limited circulation has never been entirely agreed upon. Most likely, Wagner objected to the compensation offered by American Tobacco Company or he objected to his affiliation with the sale of cigarettes.

In the mid-1980s -- 50 years after the initial $50 estimated price guide value -- one specific version of the T206 Wagner emerged mysteriously into the hobby at a Long Island memorabilia shop. This discovery became the finest and most valuable Wagner in existence and would later sell at auction for the aforementioned $2.8 million.

The coming out party for this version -- essentially the Mona Lisa of baseball cards -- was a 1991 auction. At that time, NHL legend Wayne Gretzky and Los Angeles Kings owner Bruce McNall bought the card for $451,000. Because of the jaw-dropping purchase price and the high profile of the buyers, the popular press ran wild with the story. Media coverage amplified the card’s mystique, credibility and value. Ever since, it has commonly been referred to as the Gretzky T206 Wagner.

The two key questions that the book seeks to answer is whether the Gretzky T206 Wagner was altered, and if so, by whom? It’s not a spoiler to mention here that the book’s authors surmise that the Gretzky T206 Wagner was modified into its pristine condition, an act which is strictly forbidden in the hobby. The number one suspect is Bill Mastro, who not surprisingly has had the most financial incentive to do so. Mastro has owned or auctioned the card many times.

Suspicions about the Gretzky T206 Wagner card include:

• Its progeny. Why is the lineage of something so valuable so unclear prior to 1985?
• Its condition. How are the edges and corners of a 100-year-old tobacco card so crisp?
• Its rating (8 out of 10) from a widely respected authenticator. Does a conflict of interests exist between professional authenticators and sellers?

With this many red flags, why have people been content to look away?

The book explores this, but here’s my take: A rising tide lifts all boats. When the Gretzky T206 Wagner sets a record at auction, the rest of the hobby goes along for the ride. Everyone’s assets increase in value. There’s a “Party on!” mentality.

Another problem is that markets of all kinds are difficult to regulate. Just as corporate bonds are graded by S&P’s and Moody’s, the condition of baseball cards are graded by PSA and Beckett. In both examples, the seller pays the rating agency. Conflicts of interest abound when the seller pays for a rating.

What I like most about “The Card” is that it forces the reader to think critically while covering a topic I found to be pretty fascinating. Even if you don’t think a book about a baseball card sounds very appealing, you still might like a book about the hobby’s darker underbelly. This is a nice piece of investigative work.

Favorite Line:

Beckett doesn't take any ----. Jim Beckett has been honest his entire life. He could have manipulated the market with his price guides and made a fortune, but he never did. He's one of the few honest guys in this business.

Bob Feller -- Hall of Fame 1962

Acquired: Foundation Purchase

Purchase Date: 11/5/13

Received: 11/12/13
Turnaround: 7 days
Commentary: Even though Bob Feller passed away three years ago, a stockpile of his autographed baseballs remains available for sale. I made this purchase online through the Bob Feller Museum. This marks the first time I have outright purchased an autographed baseball for my collection. It's also my first acquisition from a deceased player. The Venn diagram below summarizes the motivation behind my purchase. But really, the decision was a no-brainer. As an added note, the ball and the autograph are in excellent condition. This is a real plus when you consider there's no way of knowing for sure how long ago Bob Feller signed this ball. 

Phil Niekro -- Hall of Fame 1997

Acquired: TTM
Sent: 11/22/13
Received: 11/29/13
Turnaround: 7 days
Submittal: $25, ROMLB, LOR, SASE
My request: Blue pen, sweet spot, HOF inscription
Commentary: Phil Niekro turned around my request within a week and followed through on everything asked of him -- with one small exception. The knuckleballer signed with black pen instead of blue. The autograph, however, looks fine and so does the ink. Interestingly, I know Niekro had a blue pen readily available. When he returned the ball to me, he included a nice note both written and signed in blue pen. Niekro's stationery was embroidered with Hall of Fame lingo, including a Cooperstown logo at the top with the names of his fellow induction class. I wonder if that's a perk of induction or if he had that custom-made.

Book Review -- Francona: The Red Sox Years

Baseball players seem to approach the biography in two very different ways.

On one end of the spectrum, there is the squeaky-clean approach. This method was chosen recently by former outfielders Doug Glanville and Andre Dawson. As authors, both players pulled their punches and largely bypassed controversial topics that might prove to be inflammatory (steroids, team executives, Sammy Sosa). Bios like these encourage kids to work hard, get a good night’s sleep, eat a hearty breakfast, and so on. No bridge is burned.

On the opposite end of the spectrum, we have what Terry Francona and Dan Shaughnessy delivered. The Red Sox Years -- especially the second half -- airs dirty laundry. To be fair, this is not a vindictive tell-all of the Jose Canseco variety. But calling it a fire-bombing, as others have done, is pretty fair. 

The key targets of said fire-bombing are Red Sox owner John Henry’s business partners Larry Lucchino and Tom Werner. Bill Madden’s terrific biography of the late George Steinbrenner notably recounts Steinbrenner’s advice to Henry regarding Lucchino and Werner: “Those are two treacherous, phony backstabbers you’ve got there, John. You’re a pal, but I’ve got no use for those two bastards.” 

Turns out that Terry Francona is no fan of Lucchino and Werner, either. The back end of the book is a detailed account of ownership incompetence and Francona’s take on his bizarre departure from the Red Sox. It still seems unclear to him or to the reader if he was fired as Red Sox manager or not. 

Overall, the only challenges I encountered with the bio were a few in-game sequences that were a bit too detailed relative to my interest level. In addition, despite the book’s title, the content drifts early on to cover preceding managerial experiences.

Naturally, The Red Sox Years will appeal most to Red Sox fans. The second most likely audience for this book are Yankees fans due to the rivalry. Unexpectedly, I think Cubs fans would enjoy this behind-the-scenes look into Theo Epstein’s management style. Through Francona’s story, we learn how Epstein aspires to build and operate a franchise.  

It’s extremely difficult to write a tell-all book without coming across like a creep, but Francona pulls it off. Francona puts a lot of things in print that he probably shouldn’t, but the result feels authentic and that’s admirable. Perhaps “Francona: The Indian Years” will be the next book? If so, I look forward to it.

Favorite Line:

Epstein bristled at the notion he was Lucchino’s creation and was uncomfortable with the number of Sox employees who’d migrated from San Diego with Lucchino.

Rod Carew -- Hall of Fame 1991

Acquired: TTM
Sent: 11/7/13
Received: 11/29/13
Turnaround: 22 days
Submittal: $10 (he returned my $), ROMLB, LOR, SASE
My request: Blue pen, sweet spot, HOF inscription
Commentary: Apparently, Rod Carew is the nicest guy in the world. To my knowledge, he does not sign TTM. Yet, he did for me probably due to a unique set of circumstances. On July 4th, my wife and I were standing outside of Angel Stadium while waiting on another couple to join us. At a certain point, I nudged my wife and said, "I think that's Rod Carew!". Turns out it was. In fact, he was walking around outside The Big A like a civilian and everyone else seemed too busy to notice. Months later, I dropped a ball in the mail as well as two ticket stubs to demonstrate that, indeed, I had truly been at the game. I don't know why exactly, but I also added $10 in cash. The end result is that Rod Carew signed the ball, signed a ticket stub, and returned my money. I had only requested the ball to be signed. Because it was such a surprise, this has been the best TTM success thus far for me.

Billy Williams -- Hall of Fame 1987

Acquired: TTM
Sent: 10/11/13
Received: 11/20/13
Turnaround: 40 days
Submittal: $20, ROMLB, LOR, SASE
My request: Blue pen, sweet spot, HOF inscription
Commentary: Landing an autographed ball from Billy Williams through the mail has been my favorite success to date. When this ball came back to me, I was thrilled. There are two key reasons for this. First, I've been a Cubs fan all my life. Second, Billy Williams has a reputation as an erratic signer through the mail. Overall, I love it when the low-percentage shots pan out from your favorite players. I worded my LOR thoughtfully, which probably helped a great deal with this outcome.